Based on the available information, one may argue that there is a strong possibility that BridgeMark Scam and Konstantin Lichtenwald are closely related for a variety of reasons.
Despite this, you will be unable to get any evidence or articles from the search engine at all if you try to browse in the same way.
Are you aware of the cause of this? Because the idea of “truth” is vague. Dust of ignorance swiftly obscures its genuine identity, which takes ages to unveil.
For many decades, people hid behind the “black coats” to ensure that they received their full share of justice. However, they are blind to the reality that justice is unlikely when the whole technically sound era is eager to be commercialized.
However, there is something unattainable by purchase: “the ink pot of an authentic law-abider.” Let’s look at the dubious intentions of Konstantin Lichtenwald and BridgeMark Financial Corporation, the entities under the same name.
Konstantin Lichtenwald: Man With Early Money-Making Talent
Within BridgeMark Finance Corp., Konstantin Lichtenwald was elevated to the position of “Vice President” in 2012. He became very wealthy and well-connected in the financial industry after receiving the honor. /Konstantinlichtenwald.com
With an undergraduate degree from the University of Pforzheim, the 38-year-old financial adviser and associate graduated. A-labs Capital II Corp., Banxa Holdings Inc., Blockmate Ventures Inc., Direct Communication Solutions Inc., Biocure Technology Inc., AMG Acquisitions Corp., and others are among the financial associations that Konstantin Lichtenwald has established.
Even yet, the business owner had severe setbacks due to accusations of fraud, notwithstanding his great success. These claims raise doubts for Konstantin Lichtenwald about his company, BridgeMark, despite his persistent denials.
The purpose of the subsequent article is to uncover any relevant facts and draw a conclusion. First, let us collect some background about BridgeMark Finance Corp.
BridgeMark Finance Corporation: An Organization That Tumbles Konstantin Lichtenwald
BridgeMark states that it offers consultancy services to businesses in need of knowledge. By its formal name, Bridgemark LLC, it is a privately held company.
The company is a conglomerate with its headquarters located in Canada. North America and several regions of Europe make up the firm’s clientele.
The identities of Mr. Jackson and Konstantin Lichtenwald are expressly mentioned as the putative main participants of the company.
Mr. Anthony Jackson has been serving as the firm’s principal for the last five years, having been designated as a director on January 10th, 2014.
In contrast, Mr. Konstantin Lichtenwald joined BridgeMark Finance Corporation in 2012 and now holds the position of Vice President.
Ten years have passed since Konstantine and BridgeMark were connected. Many dawns and sunsets were seen by the company and associations throughout these years. The term “BridgeMark Scam” refers to the densest of the twilight.
The BridgeMark Scam: What is it?
Regarding the company’s alleged consultation, BridgeMark Scam notes that the consultants acknowledge that no consulting was done. Rather, it was claimed that the firm’s connected tycoons engaged in abusive behavior in the stock markets.
Are Konstantin Lichtenwald and the BridgeMark Scam Associated?
Sources said that the consultancy agreements were pompous. According to credible charges, the firms connected to the company did not deliver any services. None, supposedly, was given, and the corporate executives amassed the money spent.
Like with other charges, none of them could be confirmed, but they also suggest that BridgeMark Vice President Konstantin Lichtenwald was involved in the same.
The four scam-related businesses, however, have offered proof to refute the accusations. To understand more about the case and the perpetrators of the large-scale fraud, continue reading to the next part.
The Case: Konstantin Lichtenwald & BridgeMark LLC
BridgeMark Finance Corporation was charged with committing intentional fraud against the welfare of its consumers in the year 2020, as a result of the results. BridgeMark was also accused of participating in “conduct abusive to the capital market,” which is a criminal offense. The British Columbia Securities Commission, often known as the BCSC, served as the investigatory body for the investigation. (https://www.bcsc.bc.ca/)
Since it is quite apparent that BridgeMark Finance Corporation is a corporate conglomerate, the British Columbia Securities Commission (BCSC) accused each of the related corporations, along with Konstantin Lichtenwald.
The BCSC officers tried to strengthen the case, but they couldn’t accuse many people since there wasn’t enough proof. The next section delves into the discoveries that were uncovered by BCSC.
Konstantin Lichtenwald BCSC Extended Approach
After BCSC discovered some suspicious activity involving BridgeMark Finance, it became clear that the financial advisers were taking advantage of the North American economic powerhouse. Several consulting companies and their chief consultants were subject to trade restrictions by the BCSC shortly after.
In a broad stock scheme that included cannabis, cryptocurrency, mining, and energy shares on the Canadian Securities Exchange (CSE), BCSC charged many startup firms under Bridgemark Finance company, as well as the heads of the company, Jackson and Konstantin Lichtenwald.
What Does the Study Say About Konstantin Lichtenwald?
Twenty-five consultants, twenty-six financial service providers, and eleven firms were questioned by BCSC as part of its investigation into the BridgeMark fraud. The entire purpose of investigating these claims was to determine that insufficient evidence existed to establish their guilt.
The most unsettling thing, however, is that the primary accusers have enough power over the system to remove any evidence of their actions from the search engine results page altogether.
They have been permitted to start other businesses up to this point as the BCSC and the investigative team were unable to prove Anthony Jackson and Konstantin Lichtenwald had a close connection at the time of the fraud.
Upon closer inspection, it seems that BCSC said that the BridgeMark group had paid nickels for each share of $50.9 million worth of free-trading securities, but that most of the money had been returned to them via a questionable prepaid consulting arrangement. Not too bad, huh? Still, as said before, no amount of guile can call into question the authenticity.
Unveiled: Findings…
Jackson, Konstantin Lichtenwald, and other individuals who allegedly crafted questionable contracts were among those who allegedly recklessly crushed investor hopes.
The unethical advisors devalued their shares by deceptively selling them to normal investors at a discount.
Furthermore, it left the other investors with little option except to dilute the company’s stake. This went against the public’s demand for investment and affected the state’s economic structure.
The Justifications for the BCSC’s Upholding of Various BridgeMark Group Accused Companies
All of BCSC’s allegations were eventually proved to be untrue, despite their best efforts and several days of investigation. The commissioners of the BCSC acknowledged that there was insufficient evidence against the defendants.
According to reports, Peter Brady, the executive director of the BCSC, lacked sufficient evidence to speak with seven out of the eleven active businesses. The companies that the BCSC Director overlooked are listed below.
Unreliable Businesses That Challenged BCSC
- Kootenay Zinc Corporation
- Affinor Growers Ltd.
- Beleave Inc.
- Liht Cannabis Corporation
- PreveCeutical Medical Inc.
- Speakeasy Cannabis Club
- Abattis Bioceuticals Corporation
Allegedly “Significant” Contracts, According to Konstantin Lichtenwald and Others?
Although they were able to remove their names from the cases, all of these firms remained designated as respondents. The confirmations from the BCSC support the premise that the corporations in question sold the shares to achieve “significant” goals.
The investigating teams have not uncovered any strong evidence that would link the seven firms to any illegal or illicit transactions. No one could say for sure who received payments during the exchanges or whose contracts were dubious.
If the BCSC were to investigate the other four companies, they might potentially face claims of “unsubstantiated suspicion” as well. This means that the four companies that seemed dubious based on the evidence were never formally declared illegal, but they remained under suspicion.
Our Four VP Companies Konstantin Lichtenwald
So, what are your alternatives if the cops find out you’re committing fraud? In my drunken state, I inquired about the deal or the “it’s a conspiracy against me” theory. Such claims were made by Preveceutical, one of the corporations that were accused.
Strangely, Konstantin Lichtenwald and Bridgemark Financial Corporation are now being sued by Preveceutical. However, that is irrelevant. Now that we’re back on the subject, let’s take a look at the financial fraud that these firms committed.
Four Konstantin Lichtenwald Scammers Made Millions
Cryptoblox, New Point, Green 2, and BLOK are the purported sharks that Konstantin Lichtenwald and Jackson jointly swallowed for about $17.9 million. All, four firms recouped $15.3 million—nearly 90% of the $17.9 million in shares sold.
Although BCSC asserted all of the aforementioned, we were unable to discover any proof of the illegal ties. Consequently, the advisors evaded punishment for the alleged illegal issuance of shares, which the startups then used to get funding in the absence of a prospectus.
In any case, the panel can decide that the four companies were complicit in the actions that caused major public interest problems. The risk associated with signing the cash swap contracts was also brought up by the panel.
It should be noted that the BridgeMark Group collected upfront consultation fees from unsuspecting investors without really providing any advisory services to those customers.
Having said that, the panel did observe that the four companies’ private placement assets were much larger than the share value that they had declared to their customers.
The panel could therefore detect the fraudsters’ dirty play with relative ease. It was never possible to connect this wrongdoing to the BridgeMark scam, however.
An Uplift in Trade Orders…
According to BCSC’s claims, the BridgeMark group and other investors (including Konstantin Lichtenwald) were limited to trading. However, the investigative teams’ tight grasp progressively loosened, and the result was insignificant.
That is to say, the accused key players in the BridgeMark scam were never made to feel bad about it.
Instead, the following individuals were freed and their trading orders were lifted: Abeir Haddad, 10XCapital, Viral Stocks Inc., 727 Capital, David Raymond Duggan, David Schmidt, Tryton Finance Corporation, Saiya Capital Corporation, Tara Kerry Haddad, Natasha Emami.
According to papers and testimonies that are available to the public, the person who is allegedly involved in the scam was also never questioned about it. The consulting companies and businesses involved in the four-grip shark trade had to cope with the enlarged and prolonged orders.
Grapevines claims, however, that Konstantin Lichtenwald and Jackson negotiated several institutional and legal accords to free themselves from the lawful constraints.
Konstantin Lichtenwald Was Exempt From Liability Based on BCSC Documents, But Why?
Are you aware of this? BridgeMark Financial Corporation was one of the entities with whom BCSC found connections. Instead of one name, these papers included many organizations. Let us take note of the ones listed in the legal papers before we get to the disguised name.
- Jackson’s partner Justin Liu is active in BridgeMark Financial Corporation’s formal operations.
- Cameron Paddock: Offers BridgeMark expert consulting services. Cameron shares his office location with the suspected fraudulent company, making him one of the most visible connections to it.
- Simran Gill is the only director of BridgeMark Management Ltd.; BridgeMark Financial Corporation appointed him.
- Sharing an address with BridgeMark are JCN, Essos, Detona, and Tollstam.
- BridgeMark’s contact information is shared by Kendl, Escher, and Hunton.
- “BridgeMark Secretary” is the same as Villaneuva & Von Rowell Torres.
- Jackson’s brother-in-law, Ryan Venier, is related to him.
- Aly Babu Mawji and his spouse Denise Trainor present their trading strategies to BridgeMark.
Although the legal authorities should give serious thought to each of these names, one of the most thoughtful people, Konstantin Lichtenwald, is omitted from the list. He has avoided accusations and internet searches. Just like BCSC, Konstantin Lichtenwald, the entrepreneur, is completely silent on the internet.
But if he is not responsible, then what is? Alternatively, does his position as a vice president of BridgeMark absolve him of responsibility for the deception? Would a magical curtain be more appropriate for Konstantin Lichtenwald? Underneath all the pretense, however, is the truth that answers all these questions. It is time to expose the culprits immediately.
Konstantin Lichtenwald: Why Is He Among The Untrustworthy?
As previously indicated, in 2012, Konstantin Lichtenwald was named Vice President of the BridgeMark group. On the other hand, there was fraudulent trading throughout the year and it was reported almost in 2018.
Additionally, in Vancouver in 2021, Bridgemark colleagues were charged with insider trading and commercial wrongdoing. This means that the Vice President is not held responsible for the ridiculous $50 million swindle that the watchdog committed. In addition to this, a few more details should be mentioned:
- A vice president cannot possibly be unaware of all that is going on in the company.
- Konstantin continued to be active in other enterprises even after the BridgeMark fraud.
- Strangely, Konstantin Lichtenwald seems to be a clean chit on the internet.
Konstantin Lichtenwald: No Cause for Concern: Doubtful?
In our technological age, what is the saddening thing? The reason is, it’s easily manipulable. If they are discovered, the internet will attempt to whitewash the accused fraudsters as if they were their own family. Most of the time, these people go unpunished.
So, here’s a question for you: the Vice President was completely unaware of a huge scam that was happening right under his nose. In neither case does the entrepreneur emerge from the hours of surfing unscathed. Which proves without a doubt that this is terrible.
Nothing is being spoken about on the internet or any of the networking sites, which is both ridiculous and disheartening. There is a terrible and illegitimate stillness. Someone has to stop it now since it’s becoming late.
Conclusion
Even though Konstantin Lichtenwald isn’t named on any of the court documents, the narrative nonetheless claims that his absence from them is absurd.
Unlike a small business manager, the VP of BridgeMark is completely oblivious to his immediate surroundings. Whatever the case may be, believing it is weird in and of itself. But we may still hope for the best with the encoded legal claims or work out what else needs encoding for future claims.
In this case, a few businesses felt entitled to the state’s funds that they had wrongfully obtained, while the North Americans suffered greatly from massive financial fraud.
But nobody knows about it; how many of them are happy to stay out of sight as they enjoy their freedom? Are they include Konstantin Lichtenwald? Is it true that the vice president was completely unaware of and uninvolved in the massive dupe? Maybe we simply don’t have all the information at this point.
Until we have the answers, this discourse will continue, and it is of the utmost importance. Amidst the myriad of inquiries and charges, one aspect stands out. The “ink pot” is deserving of admiration.
